One of the most difficult techniques in photography is achieving a sharp
focus. This is why we see such a success and popularity of autofocus cameras.
Camera lens, same as the human eye, can only focus at one point at the time.
You do not believe me? Try holding a finger in front of your face and focus
your eyes on it. The finger will appear sharp, but everything arround it
will be slightly blurred. Now, shift your attention at the background. Instantly,
the background will appear sharp but your finger will be out of focus. We
usually do not notice this because our eyes have the abbility to re-focus
very quckly and fool our brain into thinking that everything around us is
bright and clear (unless we had a few drinks the previous night, of course).
Like our eyes, camera lens will render the subject and every point positioned
at a same distance plane as being truly sharp. However, objects in front
of that plane and behind it, may also appear acceptably sharp. Here is where
we introduce the term "depth of field" (DoF). There are
numerous, rather similar definitions for the DoF; let's stick with this
one:
Depth of field is the zone in front and behind the point of actual, or
critical, focus where the eye percieves the image to be in focus. DoF refers
to the section of a photograph, from the nearest to the farthest point from
the camera, which appears to be in sharp focus. Do not confuse the depth
of field with a "depth of focus"; the area in front and
behind the film within which the circle of confusion for a given
light ray would be small enough to produca an acceptably sharp image. Confused
about the circles of confusion? Do not worry - we will talk about them later
on. You will also find a list of links with further reading material at
the end of this article.
Beside the selective use of light and film exposure, depth of field provides
one of the main creative elements in photography. So, how can we use the
zone of sharp focus to our advantage?
Begginer photographers often do not consider the power of selective focus
in enhancing their images. We find a subject we are interested in, aim our
camera, press the button, and if we have an autofocus feature available,
we take a "correctly focused" image. The usual focusing problems
are those of accuarcy and not of selection. What to do if we have a group
of subjects at various distances (e.g. a tree at a base of a mountain, herd
of deer grazing in a field)? Should they all appear in sharp focus, or should
we keep some subjects slightly blurred? If there is insufficient light,
we often do not have a choice - we have to use a wide lens opening (aperture)
to allow for the maximum amount of light to reach the film. Hence, we might
be limited to only one narrow zone of sharp focus. Which one?
As the area of sharp focus is expected to coincide with the main point
of interest (eye in the human or animal portrait, or an object / figure
standing in front of a wider background), it is that point where the human
eye will automatically be drawn to. The direction of focus and attention
will lead from unsharp to sharp. Yes, we can use the selective focus to
direct the viewer's attention.
Have a look at the two photographs above. They were taken at the Chincoteague
National Wildlife Refuge (Virginia, U.S.A.) just seconds apart. Both images
were taken with a 300 mm lens at f/4 aperture opening. The Great Blue Heron
I was photographing was at the centre of my interest, hence I kept the lens
focused at the same plane field as the bird. The wide aperture diameter
of my lens produced a shallow DoF: only a small portion of foreground and
background appears acceptably sharp. Suddenly, in the corner of my eye (out
of focus), I noticed a White-tailed deer emerging through an opening in
vegetation. I quickly changed the focusing point of my lens, to make the
image of the deer appear sharp. In the second photograph the focus is progressive,
leading the eye rapidly upward from blurred foreground to the zone of sharp
focus. By deciding to change the point of maximum focus, I changed the subject
of viewer's attention.
Part 2: Creative use of the shallow depth
of field and circles of confusion